I agree with Zebrowski-Rubin in a sense that the idea of using human hair is "fascinating" because hair is a great deal of who we are and can describe our emotions and personalities because it is "attached to our history." I also agree with the idea that hair describes culture and religion, hair growth is a cycle (we cut it after it grows slowly), and I think that it is worth mentioning that hair (along with nails) grows after death. These are the iteams that Zebrowski-Rubin hits on where I do see eye to eye with him because I feel that these messages can been displayed through Boreham's medium choice of hair. What I do not agree with is that Zebrowski-Rubin points out that the second room of Boreham's work brings it down in a sense. I think that Zebrowski-Rubin was only trying to show more of her thoughts and give more energy towards the message that she wanted her audience to take from her work. Also, in my opinion the work did not take away from the messages of her sculpture but added to them by showing the artist's versatility. I feel that the aritcle may be lacking in organization, but the author was overall able to sum up his ideas and feeling of his exhibit experience. Zebrowski-Rubin did a good job with describing poetic meaning of hair, but he should have spoke more about what Boreham's thoughts were and what the message was that she wanted to display from her work.
I have become interested in Boreham's art because of her risk in materials and way of communication through them. Personally I think that Boreham's exploration and use of materials at such a young age of twenty-two shows that today young artists are still trying new things which is why I think that the artical is relevant and modern. Her age is also another reason why I can relate to the young artist. Overall Zebrowski-Rubin did a good job supporting his ideas of her work, but I feel that his criticisms may have been to analyitic.
Melanie Boreham, Forest of the Inside |
Melanie Boreham, Present Pasts |
No comments:
Post a Comment